
 |
|
Posted on: 2007-12-24 15:24:18
| Self Repair: A Valuable Attribute
We would be in awe if blue jeans or automobiles possessed the ability to repair themselves. Organizations have the ability to repair themselves, yet we think nothing of it.
In fact, most people think so little of it that sparse attention is paid to facilitating this coveted ability. The ability to self-repair, as distinct from continuously bringing in outside help for diagnosis and treatment, is one of the most valuable, yet under-nourished, attributes of organizations.
When a black hole has been chewing away within an organization for a while it can demoralize employees. Like servers in a restaurant who say "that's not my section" when you request a glass of water, demoralized employees often withdraw and take responsibility only for the work in front of them. They no longer make an effort to understand and improve the flow of materials, documents, communications and the like that streams into their work area. Likewise, they no longer make an effort to understand and improve the flow of their completed tasks as work moves to the next station or user.
In the presence of black holes, employees grow isolated and uncooperative. They put on blinders and work to rule ¨C even if it is on a subconscious level. On the other hand, motivated, cooperative employees understand the functions prior to and subsequent to their own work. If they see a problem outside their job description, they get involved and work to solve it. If this attitude existed across all departments within an organization, then at least three employees would have a view of each function, four if we include the supervisor. When such an environment of understanding and cooperation exists, the organization possesses the ability to self-repair.
How can a beaten-down, withdrawn employee or department regain the interest and ability to help repair the organization? A tremendous survival instinct is unleashed within an organization when black holes are identified and eradicated. As a matter of course, employees once again become willing to help repair the organization.
Regaining the ability to self-repair is just one of the many benefits your organization would reap if you were to eradicate black holes. In short, eradicating black holes is powerful medicine that can improve the health of any organization.
Ron Lutka
Copyright 2007, Corporate Streamlining Technology Inc.
| Posted on: 2007-12-01 08:51:04
| What Are Black Holes in Organizations?
Extract from chapter one of Black Holes in Organizations.
The Oxford Dictionary of Current English, third edition, defines a black hole as "a region of space having a gravitational field so intense that no matter or radiation can escape." [footnotes omitted]
Whereas astronomical black holes suck up matter and energy, black holes in organizations suck up valuable resources, including human energy, time, space, materials, and money. A black hole is a significant entity, not something to be ignored. One ignores black holes in an organization at his or her peril and, unfortunately, at the peril of many innocent people.
Definition of a Black Hole
A black hole in an organization can be defined as follows:
An area of an organization where there is, unbeknownst to management, an abundance of undesirable activities or a lack of desirable activities, both of which destroy organizations.
Three Basic Components
A black hole in an organization includes the following components:
1. Destruction in some form occurs within the organization, whether in the form of undesirable activity or a lack of desirable activity.
2. There is an abundance of undesirable activity, or a lack of abundance of desirable activity, not merely an occasional occurrence.
3. Management might or might not be aware of the destruction, but management definitely has an absence of awareness of the root cause of the destruction.
Ron Lutka
Copyright 2007, Corporate Streamlining Technology Inc.
| Posted on: 2007-11-26 18:12:27
| Long Before Visible
It is characteristic of black holes that they cause damage to organizations well before the damage becomes openly visible. Therefore, why wait until the damage is visible before searching out then eradicating black holes?
Before margins fall, customers complain, cash flow becomes threatened and employee moral drops, black holes lay the ground-work for negative situations and failure. For example, failing to fully complete tasks before passing documents or plant materials to the next person or neglecting to respond to a co-worker's query both sow the seeds for a choked organization.
After choked comes frustration. After frustration comes blame. After blame comes apathy and a decline in productivity. Somewhere along this emotional chain comes a deteriorated financial situation...including write-offs.
Gaining control over black holes is something management could benefit from; however, to do so management must consider:
- What black holes are
- The possibility black holes exist in the organization
- The damage black holes can cause to the organization, to executives and to staff
Once management acknowledges the possibility of the existence of black holes in the organization, the full support of management can be harnessed and focused on eradicating black holes. This action can even be built into management's strategic plans.
The eradication of black holes can strengthen an organization, leading to improved margins, happier customers who become repeat customers, increased cash flow and better employee morale. No management team would consciously seek the alternative - ongoing damage that can lead to the failure of the organization.
When damage caused by black holes is visible, the black holes have been active for a long time.
But initially, the damage is out of sight. It should not be out of mind.
Must the bridge collapse because of unseen structural defects before an engineer acknowledges that it might have weak spots? Must the damage caused by black holes be seen before the black holes are tackled?
Ron Lutka
Copyright 2007, Corporate Streamlining Technology Inc.
| Posted on: 2007-03-31 22:42:46
| The Reality of Black Holes
It is from experience and not from sitting in an ivory tower that I gathered the data for the book Black Holes in Organizations. I strongly believe you and your organization can benefit significantly from my observations. To this day, much of my time is spent in the middle management "trenches" and supervisor and worker "weeds" the adventure constantly reinforcing the presence, frequency, and viciousness of black holes.
What keeps me awake at night is trying to resolve this riddle: How can I wake the world to the reality of black holes, their pervasiveness, and the destruction they cause, and encourage management to become passionate about the identification and eradication of them, especially when we have a solution at hand? The writing of the book Black Holes in Organizations is one small step in that direction. Creating this website is another. The occasional talk to small groups is a third. Banging on doors is a fourth¡ªso please allow me to enter when the shutters rattle.
Whether you are already feeling the pain of a black hole manifesting itself on financial statements or in operations, or you want to identify and resolve as many black hole-creating items as possible before they create visible problems, this book will get you started.
You can make substantial gains by applying some of the thoughts in the book; however, for many reasons, the services of specialists in this area are required in order to make a significant impact. Corporate Streamlining Company Inc. was established for that purpose. First, let's get up to the level of understanding black holes and recognizing some of their symptoms. Perhaps removing a few black hole-creating items from your organization in-house will not only give you a win, but will also show you the reality of the situation. The book can help you accomplish this.
Like ailments and diseases, one is wise to treat the problem very early rather than wait until the only "solution" is amputation¡ªor heroic surgery that might or might not work.
Ron Lutka
Copyright 2007, Corporate Streamlining Technology Inc.
| Posted on: 2007-03-11 12:56:17
| Adam Smith, Hammer and Champy Still Have a 'Monkey'
Adam Smith's 'division of labour' organizations and Michael Hammer's and James Champy's reengineered 'process' organizations were insights of genius. Both advanced industry and commerce remarkably.
However, both carry a 'monkey' on their back—both require a system to hold the form of the organization moving forward.
Syntropy and entropy remain in constant battle within organizations regardless of what organizational model is constructed: the division of labour model or the process model. Syntropy is building the organization up, aligning the organization, making it function as desired by management—while entropy is hard at work breaking the organization down.
Entropy is at work when workloads become unbalanced, incomplete work stacks up, people err, people become complacent or lazy, people forget, people become overwhelmed, people are competitive and compete against one another, organizations compete against organizations, and people with unrelated interests somehow or other impinge upon organizations in varying ways: creditors wanting payment; and governments wanting tax money, statistics, and compliance to regulations are two such examples.
For all of these reasons, and many more, black holes form in organizations therefore organizations need a system for locating black hole-creating items that can then be eradicated. Doing so will go a long way to lifting the 'monkey' off the back of both the 'division of labour' structured organization and the reengineered 'process' organization.
The above will help you understand where black holes in organizations and Corporate Streamlining Technology?(that helps locate and eradicate black hole-creating items) fit into the organizational betterment landscape.
Ron Lutka
Copyright 2007, Corporate Streamlining Technology Inc.
| Posted on: 2007-02-18 07:54:34
| Let's Get Specific
Q. Specifically, what harm do black holes cause?
A. Specifically, what are you as an executive trying to achieve?
Simple yet essential basic activities of an organization support the goals of the organization, and all the desires and dreams and passions executives derive from it, including financial gain, prestige, and personal satisfaction.
If mops were delivered to customers late, well after the flood, and if the handles snapped during use because purchasing acquired the wrong wood, customers would flee and an objective of the organization would not be realized. If an executive wanted to help the organization realize its objectives then black holes could cause the executive disappointment in this way. Similarly, the embarrassment of snapping handles was not what the director of purchasing wanted to achieve and so he suffered a personal loss in the face of his peers. Finally, the marketing vice-president who was about to launch a marketing campaign promoting the high quality and reliability of the company's products retracted the program.
What harm does a flat tire cause to the driver of the car? That depends on who is the driver. If he were a race car driver trying to win a race it could cost him the race, or possibly his life, or the life of another driver. If he were a taxi cab driver it could cost him money in lost business plus repair costs. If he were a young man on his way to pick up a pretty date it could cost him a kiss.
What are you trying to achieve both professionally and personally?
"Specifically, what harm do black holes cause?" You tell me.
Ron Lutka
Copyright 2007, Corporate Streamlining Technology Inc.
| Posted on: 2007-02-17 22:03:46
| As Management Intended
Wouldn't it be great if organizations functioned as management intended?
I know it would be great for management. It would likely be great for shareholders and creditors, and it would probably be great for most employees also. Customers would likely be happy too.
What prohibits organizations from functioning as management intended? Not much except lack of reinforcement, lack of attention to details, and inattention to simple yet essential basic activities of the organization.
Over time, the inattention to basic activities allows black hole-creating items to develop and propagate. A simple procedure that was not put in place here, an established procedure that fell out of use there, common sense left at the front door, creeping mediocrity: these seemingly innocent failings derail management's good intentions. A few simple breaks can be absorbed. Simple breaks in volume cause a drag on performance of many kinds. Left unattended, an organization can make the news.
The concept of black holes in organizations is new, therefore I understand the difficulty executives may have directing much attention to simple activities. I must tell you, I have trouble encouraging executives to look down into the "trenches" and "weeds". It is my great hope the book Black Holes in Organizations will change that. Executives stop at "business processes". However, there are levels below business processes that if not functioning properly can harm organizations: activity is one, and there are others lower still...much lower. Maybe they fear what is down there. Maybe they do not know how to look in this area. Maybe they think they cannot control what they find. Maybe it is as simple as not wanting to get one's hands dirty.
This brings us back to "as management intended."
"Intention" is thought. The realization of "intention" requires action.
Ron Lutka
Copyright 2007, Corporate Streamlining Technology Inc.
|
|
|
|
 |
|